Fixed-scope project
Best when you know what you need built and want a firm price and date.
- Agreed scope, cost and delivery date
- Milestone-based payments
- Fixed post-launch support window
- Suited to MVPs, websites, single apps
We choose tools for what a project needs, not for what the team already knows. This is what that pool currently looks like.
React · Next.js · Angular · TypeScript · Tailwind CSS · Redux · Framer Motion · GSAP
Flutter · Dart · React Native · Swift · Kotlin · GetX · Bloc · Riverpod · Hive
Node.js · NestJS · Golang · FastAPI · Django · Laravel · PHP · GraphQL · tRPC
PostgreSQL · MongoDB · MySQL · Redis · Prisma · Supabase · Firebase · Pinecone
Solidity · Rust · Hyperledger Fabric · Indy · Corda · OpenZeppelin · IPFS · Web3.js
AWS · Docker · Kubernetes · Terraform · GitHub Actions · Vercel · Nginx · Sentry
Pick the one that fits how settled your requirements are and how much of the process you want to run yourself.
Best when you know what you need built and want a firm price and date.
Best for evolving products where priorities shift month to month.
Best when you have a team and an in-house gap to fill quickly.
The same five stages apply whether the build takes six weeks or a year. Only the length of each stage changes.
Some projects need the flexibility of sprints. Some need a fixed specification signed before a line is written. We pick the model in discovery and commit to it in the contract.
If your requirements are stable and the budget is fixed, Waterfall gives you certainty on cost and date. If the product will change as real users touch it, Scrum gives you the ability to reorder priorities every two weeks. Most of our clients end up on the hybrid: a fixed, signed specification for architecture and scope, then agile sprints for the build.
Each department contributes at the stage where it matters. You get one delivery manager as your point of contact, and access to the specialists behind them.